ethan you think your no-one driver/mobule is not too bad
i also something something something /c2021081105:37

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:58 AM Conor Williams <conor.williams@gmail.com>
wrote:

> and dr john nelson in University Limerick -- a fine reputable uni down
> south ireland (with
> loads of good professor types and students (most of them anyways)
> stole my fyp and bought me lunch and said nothing about nothing and then
> told me to
> fuck off over the phone when i was enquiring about doing a phd which i will
> and has links into the psychaitric system and they keep locking me up to
> hide their slimy pasts
> and that my friends is not the end of that parrticular conundrum... keep
> posted on irc... will let
> u know what channel /c:202109200858:51
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:52 AM Conor Williams <conor.williams@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> and tim roberts on an unrelated topic is a bunch of un-ethical hackers
>> diminishing the intellect of the humanity /c:202109200851
>> hack the planet my fiends...
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:45 AM Conor Williams <conor.williams@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> i figured out the random hack which messed me up 12 years ago 2 days ago
>>> /c:f20
>>> and the buda bug is fixed on my system - took me 3 days strait to find
>>> it...
>>> and the fuseblk hack took a while /c:2021
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:39 AM Conor Williams <conor.williams@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> if it is a vfat filesystem it is ok....
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:37 AM Conor Williams <
>>>> conor.williams@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> some of the fuseblk disc/k drivers/modules on peppermint which is a
>>>>> flavour of ubuntu
>>>>> are not even in the kernel space and there are mount.XYZ processes
>>>>> left open which are
>>>>> wide open to attack (with # fuser -p <PID>) /c09
>>>>> for those chips tings
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:24 AM hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> i think the main reason people are willing to fall for the android
>>>>>> platform is bec. there is no good long-term supply of updated phone
>>>>>> hardware with backwards-compatible interfaces.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a lot of qualcomm and mediatek chipsets are being built, but instead
>>>>>> of documentation they only ship half-baked linux drivers, which are
>>>>>> often not even mainlined.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> those linux drivers are already hard to make work on actual linux
>>>>>> distributions, or even on android distributions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> who wants to reverse-engineer the hardware over and over again based
>>>>>> on such linux drivers...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/20/21, Ethan Gardener <eekee57@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>>>>> > tl;dr: forget inferno, port plan 9 to the pine phone.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, at 6:43 AM, Dave Eckhardt wrote:
>>>>>> >> > Anyone know if this project went anywhere?
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~412/lectures/L05_Purge_Proposal.pdf
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I had to laugh at one of the slides. Inferno running natively on
>>>>>> "x86
>>>>>> > supercomputer"? I think implementing multicore support would be a
>>>>>> first
>>>>>> > step, not to mention 64-bit! While it would be nice if those jobs
>>>>>> were done,
>>>>>> > they will take time and effort. Overall, if porting natively, I see
>>>>>> little
>>>>>> > sense in preferring Inferno to Plan 9, especially as Plan 9 already
>>>>>> supports
>>>>>> > 64-bit multicore.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> Sadly, not.  One issue is that modern Android releases don't
>>>>>> >> support 32-bit executables, and at the time that project was
>>>>>> >> attempted Inferno was somewhat 32-bit (I haven't looked since).
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Recalling the issues Hellaphone had and the time it took, I'm of
>>>>>> the opinion
>>>>>> > that getting Inferno to work on any given phone's Linux kernel is
>>>>>> hardly
>>>>>> > more worthwhile than porting it directly to the hardware. The
>>>>>> kernels have
>>>>>> > undocumented interfaces.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > A current thread on OSdev (operating system development) forums is
>>>>>> looking
>>>>>> > at phones. It's a little rambly, but it reports on some encouraging
>>>>>> things.
>>>>>> > Lots of "baseband processors" (the phone-network communication
>>>>>> subsystems)
>>>>>> > have documented interfaces. There are at least 2 phones available
>>>>>> now which
>>>>>> > are fully open for operating system development: the PinePhone and
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> > Librem 5. (5 is the screen size.) Of the 2, the Pine Phone seems
>>>>>> better, not
>>>>>> > least because it can boot from the SD card; useful for testing.
>>>>>> > https://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=53251
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > There's also the option of building your own phone out of
>>>>>> components. The
>>>>>> > thread has some info. I'm guessing most here would prefer a
>>>>>> PinePhone.
>>>>>> >> But I think I saw some recent-ish Inferno-on-Android activity here:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>   https://github.com/bhgv/Inferno-OS-bhgv
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > That's probably a good source of code. bhgv is a freelance
>>>>>> programmer who
>>>>>> > was very interested in Inferno and made several improvements
>>>>>> including
>>>>>> > Truetype fonts. The last I heard was he tried to find paid work
>>>>>> involving
>>>>>> > Inferno but couldn't, so he didn't have time to work on it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 9fans: 9fans
>>>>>> Permalink:
>>>>>> https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T39aec8f3f9d8503d-M0f66e73ea984adbad982f776
>>>>>> Delivery options:
>>>>>> https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
>>>>>>

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T39aec8f3f9d8503d-M0f2c2ce902355bf729901f86
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription