From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F36A29795 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 19:35:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gaff.inri.net ([168.235.71.243]) by 9front; Sun Apr 7 13:33:14 -0400 2024 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([168.235.81.125]) by gaff; Sun Apr 7 13:33:13 -0400 2024 Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 13:33:12 -0400 From: Stanley Lieber To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: <5f0b967c15681b0e@orthanc.ca> References: <37_SdgKfn22mapMSQ9N0vLD2I5xEwg8PlsWufRcP6RmucjZLxvGsf2Wjo4UmOvgaSh3HpJh8HAvfhSMSGwdNnoqofOqtd7EGZk6PyO0MPcY=@protonmail.com> <5f0b93d67d15366f@orthanc.ca> <5f0b967c15681b0e@orthanc.ca> Message-ID: <0E3B88C8-9571-4A31-B2FB-06847D2752CF@stanleylieber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: stateless core blockchain scripting-aware backend Subject: Re: [9front] Expired SSL certificate Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On April 7, 2024 12:47:30 PM EDT, "Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)" wrote: >Kurt H Maier writes: > >> More or less antisocial than just taking the server down? > >If the hg tree is dead and the commit history is also available >in git, then yes, I would say decommissioning hg is the right >thing to do=2E That way, if newcomers are exploring for Plan 9 >code, they won't be mislead by ancient creaky code=2E > >This frustrated me with Plan9port for a long time=2E 37+ different >repos =2E=2E=2E which one do I believe? > >--lyndon > the one pointed to in the lastest iso and the fqa=2E sl