From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FD927BEA
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Thu,  4 Apr 2024 23:05:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by 9front; Thu Apr  4 17:03:56 -0400 2024
Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 841c4ef3
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eigenstate.org; h=
	message-id:to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=ZXmDn/jT8U09
	xBemE5D9jQ0gc34=; b=V3SZzdJXYlsTgUyhhw0L3dfAMpdPZHTMZh6Wq7NnpGlD
	b43SKJfw6/82Pgl7YWEgVngrTJPta1Q9DrBVCTnMLqmAUdKq9+NdgU0QmOcrMk7y
	iryQdGgHoQ/+zLPw5jT02h+cm8bTu9EUB+EggnL9BAGeAS2YjYDrqYldSg70RwM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=eigenstate.org; h=message-id
	:to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=BenRDn+FO3m6gRut0h4
	fqyFi7eFYhfGY8liLtaiJ1Dz2Kg+AYd6o9/BwVHNpkOo+kntyaw4e2ycj+ZLSyBo
	LtH6pHaDQ+7QViUC+pMAIYK7ysuY5Yky1Q7s/a6GjmJA/GjJwWiN99CRvrWaArYo
	SKqm5907GAmnsC2RQs9vi5iI=
Received: from abbatoir (pool-108-6-24-2.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [108.6.24.2])
	by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 8bffd138 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1B93E530C6703688BD56070231A8492B@eigenstate.org>
To: 9front@9front.org
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 17:03:53 -0400
From: ori@eigenstate.org
In-Reply-To: <NueWEKg--F-9@tutamail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: ISO-certified immutable reduce/map backend 
Subject: Re: [9front] 10Gbit PCIE Intel 85299-1SFP Troubleshooting
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

% pci -v
<snip>
1.0.0:	net  02.00.00 8086/1557  11 0:e030000c 524288 2:0000f001 32 4:e038000c 16384
	Intel Corporation 82599 10 Gigabit Network Connection

This card works for me out of the box, with a 10g sfp.
What specific PCI id do you have? what SFP?

This is going to take some debugging.

Quoth Mr Neuralwright <neuralwright@tutamail.com>:
> Hi All,
> I have recently acquired a 10Gbit PCIE Intel 85299-1SFP network card since this chipset is supported in 9front, although now I suspect the driver may have only RJ45 port variants of 85299 supported, and not SFP - hopefully I'm wrong and I'm just missing something.
> 
> #ip/ipconfig
> "no success with DHCP*
> 
> #ip/ipconfig -g 192.168.1.1 ether /net/ether0 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.0
> #ip/ping 192.168.1.1
> Pings fail
> #cat /net/ether0/adder
> successfully returns a MAC address
> 
> (Yes, ether0 is the PCIE card and not the integrated NIC)
> Notably the Rx/Tx lights on the SFP port do not light up at all. Networking and the activity lights work perfectly fine on Ubuntu out-the-box, so the hardware is fine.
> 
> 9front does at least recognise the device exists, which is a start. Any suggestions on how to resolve this?