From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E77925D87 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:13:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Tue Feb 13 15:12:13 -0500 2024 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org; s=20200506; t=1707855131; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=y19gfHonIaCDLgW4Pa292eP6zuGGSHK10ymg5MRTbbw=; b=bZ84ANbBznc9Q96EcGdcB6znWQrpcLFK0Pv3vMnm8wewUqVcBF4inx3BXeF8QnD2ZY4My4 5DKSMrqV7Pgejw6MaQ8u+TMko8xJuk7NAxtO2Rib0B6wzkrpeobaC42bONCOZZmFnG8GBV XwnD+uMG0hHPXQ5hH4Q7cZC1ecO9NcI= Received: from [192.168.168.200] ( [207.45.82.38]) by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7af814ba (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:12:11 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <1ca1f9a0-25dd-4691-9b4c-8a4558993b32@posixcafe.org> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:12:11 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: 9front@9front.org References: <84D027DAB494EDDB72E255D518F54583@eigenstate.org> From: Jacob Moody In-Reply-To: <84D027DAB494EDDB72E255D518F54583@eigenstate.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: virtualized leveraged scripting STM solution Subject: Re: [9front] Re: commit 671d8daa0f2d7f067b8ab3d547adbd718da93fe9 Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 2/13/24 13:36, ori@eigenstate.org wrote: > Quoth Dave Woodman : >> On 13/02/2024 18:21, Anthony Martin wrote: >>> Jacob Moody once said: >>>> I admit I was unfamiliar with the varying adoption dates. >>>> I thought it was referring to the use of the Gregorian calendar >>>> itself, not the adoption date. I removed it because referring to >>>> England's colonies in the present tense rubs me the wrong way. >>>> I pitched this on the grid and others had also shared my reading of this. >>>> >>>> I agree that we can document that this is the adoption rate used, but I would >>>> like to be more direct with it. >>> Understood. I suggest either reverting the commit if you, like >>> myself, enjoy Unix history or restoring the original but with the >>> parenthetical about the colonies removed. Just saying England >>> should be fine. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Anthony >>> >> Sitting here in Blighty I agree that the original wording seemed to >> imply that the colonies were still a thing. As an absolute minimum, >> re-phasing to be 'former colonies' if the original intent of >> geographical scope needs  to be maintained, otherwise just England, as >> proposed. >> >> Dave. > > My proposed color for this bikeshed: > > 'The date of the Gregorian Reformation in England (Sept 2, 1752) is assumed.' > I personally agree with what Ori has purposed here if this works for others as well. Sorry for my misinformed original patch. - moody