From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDA622236 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 21:47:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from gaff.inri.net ([168.235.71.243]) by 9front; Sun Feb 18 15:47:03 -0500 2024 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([168.235.81.125]) by gaff; Sun Feb 18 15:47:03 -0500 2024 Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 15:47:02 -0500 From: Stanley Lieber To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: References: <517C8379-46CB-4013-BF1E-519F90D6A866@stanleylieber.com> <1224E13D-45C3-4C53-9A11-B6A71DC19B68@stanleylieber.com> <2A4B8568-E724-466F-8BA6-6AE45DA8A770@stanleylieber.com> Message-ID: <3BF28CAC-0EB1-4FB0-80DC-521D38647440@stanleylieber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: property lifecycle full-stack solution Subject: Re: [9front] frontbase Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On February 18, 2024 3:43:11 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >i forgot that suckless base tools and suckless 9base tools are >something distinct=2E >the last suckless 9base commits (from https://git=2Esuckless=2Eorg/9base/= ) were > >Date Commit message Author Files + - >2019-09-11 22:46 hoc: Don't nest calls to follow() when lexing ++/+=3D >and --/-=3D Evan Gates 1 +2 -2 >2017-08-06 07:30 replaced sbrk() uses with malloc() Anselm R Garbe 3 +13 = -12 >2017-06-07 15:58 ed: avoid name collision with libc's >getline=2E Christopher Brannon 1 +1 -0 > >a lot more activity is happening in the original plan9port upstream: >https://github=2Ecom/9fans/plan9port/commits/master/ > >On 2/18/24, Stanley Lieber wrote: >> On February 18, 2024 3:35:52 PM EST, Stanley Lieber >> wrote: >>>On February 18, 2024 3:29:13 PM EST, hiro <23hiro@gmail=2Ecom> wrote: >>>>and the sbase people aren't maintaining any version of this that would >>>>work on bsd? >>>> >>>>On 2/18/24, Stanley Lieber wrote: >>>>> a bunch of years later, i've pushed minor changes to frontbase: >>>>> >>>>> https://code=2E9front=2Eorg/hg/frontbase >>>>> >>>>> - change default OBJTYPE to x86_64 >>>>> - suggest CC =3D egcc for openbsd (otherwise it won't build) >>>>> - replace remaining mentions of "9base" with "frontbase" >>>>> >>>>> for those who forgot, this is our fork of the final mercurial >>>>> commit of 9base=2E a few 9front tweaks and additions were made >>>>> (circa 2016), but it hasn't been touched since then=2E >>>>> >>>>> the original intention was to have this track with 9front >>>>> changes to the base tools=2E >>>>> >>>>> right now it doesn't build on openbsd with clang=2E >>>>> >>>>> patches welcome=2E >>>>> >>>>> sl >>>>> >>>> >>> >>>no clue, does that still exist? >>> >>>sl >>> >> >> i forgot, sbase has nothing to do with plan 9 tools=2E >> >> sl >> > yes=2E the point of frontbase was to track 9front changes=2E sl