From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211A1238A8
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Sun,  7 Apr 2024 18:48:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orthanc.ca ([208.79.93.154]) by 9front; Sun Apr  7 12:47:34 -0400 2024
Received: from orthanc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by orthanc.ca (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id b76f7d5e;
	Sun, 7 Apr 2024 09:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)" <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
To: 9front@9front.org, Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
In-reply-to: <ZhICZuuNfpq2wZBh@wopr>
References: <37_SdgKfn22mapMSQ9N0vLD2I5xEwg8PlsWufRcP6RmucjZLxvGsf2Wjo4UmOvgaSh3HpJh8HAvfhSMSGwdNnoqofOqtd7EGZk6PyO0MPcY=@protonmail.com> <ZhGUnU9rixeFfzu8@wopr> <5f0b93d67d15366f@orthanc.ca> <ZhICZuuNfpq2wZBh@wopr>
Comments: In-reply-to Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net>
   message dated "Sat, 06 Apr 2024 19:18:14 -0700."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <54749.1712508450.1@orthanc.ca>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 09:47:30 -0700
Message-ID: <5f0b967c15681b0e@orthanc.ca>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: SOAP reduce/map-based lifecycle interface 
Subject: Re: [9front] Expired SSL certificate
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

Kurt H Maier writes:

> More or less antisocial than just taking the server down?

If the hg tree is dead and the commit history is also available
in git, then yes, I would say decommissioning hg is the right
thing to do.  That way, if newcomers are exploring for Plan 9
code, they won't be mislead by ancient creaky code.

This frustrated me with Plan9port for a long time.  37+ different
repos ... which one do I believe?

--lyndon