From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C032235C9
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2024 01:13:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by 9front; Sun Mar 10 20:11:21 -0400 2024
Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 86cdee05
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eigenstate.org; h=
	message-id:to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=0I3z80dm9qEJ
	vRSMCKA/exCWqHc=; b=PxiIplK+yDf+dmAaBB+uTOwZqmQbfYyj8KRJnvV33fK6
	IkCtpM4AvZVO0lpiEkfVF+TeXA+xW43P5f76XyEvHUxNiUGo1YPjeHox6FIflUhL
	jf9aiJzdSDqpIoHMFx7DO8K7c/aJvuTd8fog1ulaZOPdfpy50iRNXsunCramm4Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=eigenstate.org; h=message-id
	:to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=AMBrZfwcGmt81BHBHtP
	I2FthBwJetac1REko+Tz9J+FhkPcQrDbTiv3okVaadhd67sTlf2n5Ak1ICtUTBuh
	PPdzJaQGFJOmqz7WyuWbT+CQ6y2OBZBffPIkrCmy85sd4FExu98fin+PEPCmPR3e
	jDhoTiPlWA9e7gzKDtWETL2o=
Received: from abbatoir (pool-108-6-24-2.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [108.6.24.2])
	by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ab584a92 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Sun, 10 Mar 2024 17:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <65F5E80D080E7A8D01FC5CCE71CC4FBB@eigenstate.org>
To: 9front@9front.org
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 20:11:15 -0400
From: ori@eigenstate.org
In-Reply-To: <17101116980.dc049.73423@lsd.chicago.il.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: flexible content-addressed interface ActivityPub base-oriented blockchain 
Subject: Re: [9front] Is 9front Generally Considered To Be The Successor To Plan9?
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoth Jay F. Shachter <jay@m5.chicago.il.us>:
> 
> This is a 9front mailing list, to which Plan9 questions are routinely
> asked (e.g., "What is the Plan 9 equivalent of uname?").
> 
> Is 9front widely considered to be the successor to Plan9, in the sense
> that, e.g., Fortran90 is the successor to Fortran77, such that answers
> descriptive of Fortran90 can be given to a question about "Fortran"?

Depends who's answering. Why do you care?