From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F51521D1F for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:19:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by 9front; Wed Apr 17 02:17:30 -0400 2024 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAC2A240029 for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:17:25 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1713334645; bh=xjP5fknCEZ3nsv4jPAmzEBxlyfSjxoFszn5vexlzNkw=; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To: Subject:Message-ID:From; b=RFdyE+/TOlC+eeoJOaO9JUtlUc4MRwvwSKSnPhAUxxgeoIt4KOQZmqEShItwgcb/k n/8R/wDqgJkgStY300UGmyDOSYJ3eax5GLfTLxIaFc1DTJt5ohouiPpAd/UylEU86A EMuSsD6Yuovy9LsbvICo9Hsqnce7Tk8flRZPxxzjju7mEquB27KaQV7hLrov1fuVFO lXCu8SSDnDfv+0bxViXsGW8BcQDGOMTkozgm0tVL4EanhbBds3mMOiMvpSJ8MzziVF ayNL2oNQjeUT7mTAT3bfuQzNnAtL4n2lPO++Qa7K29MNKL+KcD+hK37bgy4M1a05DP WY+MfGA/ibzNA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VK9g932Crz9rxN for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:17:25 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 06:17:25 +0000 From: alex-ml@posteo.de To: 9front <9front@9front.org> Message-ID: <91e7a735acb4d6d46839c333877a69c0@posteo.de> List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: advanced distributed template-oriented general-purpose-based interface Subject: [9front] Minor Deviations in Section 4.3.11+ of the =?UTF-8?Q?FQA=3F?= Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Hello, I have noticed minimal differences in the wording of the installer and the FQA in section 4.3.11 and following. Is this because I am using a nigthly build, or could I send a patch for the FQA? Thank you and best regards, Alex