From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_NAME_MR_MRS,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C0A22795 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 21:13:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]) by 9front; Thu Apr 4 15:10:26 -0400 2024 Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B092610601FE for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 19:10:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1712257824; s=s1; d=tutamail.com; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=rFqiI7XnO7uEsRAeFwcbPU57Idt+fi+nHpnxORZU9OA=; b=03XHZtF2lVILQ9Zlqq+XhMSySrGF2jYXXD6044QLbpKubri3cF0vJK7XM3KC1mEy vtFyaB3SpeHUQ6iD4VjgveUQOKTj7Y3U3tBdVl1fwbvNF7TU2YYrWEyXzdel4Yg8H4F cpx6+lzTcPb4UV1UeWCSu//Mw/+FJqzsRZJw9aZN4OTD9vrVDNHqwFfT6juoS82ODOm FgsPyNrxkCQtChHQrizRgoprUmnfRFPi9KeZ1TO1lS2u5+XFeklUkJy7BUfB8tzdR1n xpzfhF3hKlJDLIFlpTQbybk7bFpVMUD+ifthxi62cyi5cT68r7CdCFWi4AqRFxjH8C2 vRwxsSmLSA== Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 21:10:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Mr Neuralwright To: 9front <9front@9front.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_8832_375978252.1712257824716" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: ISO-certified proven information-oriented scripting template general-purpose lifecycle-oriented control Subject: [9front] 10Gbit PCIE Intel 85299-1SFP Troubleshooting Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk ------=_Part_8832_375978252.1712257824716 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, I have recently acquired a=C2=A010Gbit PCIE Intel 85299-1SFP network card s= ince this chipset is supported in 9front, although now I suspect the driver= may have only RJ45 port variants of=C2=A085299 supported, and not SFP - ho= pefully I'm wrong and I'm just missing something. #ip/ipconfig "no success with DHCP* #ip/ipconfig -g 192.168.1.1 ether /net/ether0 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.0 #ip/ping 192.168.1.1 Pings fail #cat /net/ether0/adder successfully returns a MAC address (Yes, ether0 is the PCIE card and not the integrated NIC) Notably the Rx/Tx lights on the SFP port do not light up at all. Networking= and the activity lights work perfectly fine on Ubuntu out-the-box, so the = hardware is fine. 9front does at least recognise the device exists, which is a start. Any sug= gestions on how to resolve this? ------=_Part_8832_375978252.1712257824716 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi All,

I have recently acquired a 10Gbit PCIE Intel 85299-1SFP network card= since this chipset is supported in 9front, although now I suspect the driv= er may have only RJ45 port variants of 85299 supported, and not SFP - = hopefully I'm wrong and I'm just missing something.

#ip/ipconfig
"no= success with DHCP*

= #ip/ipconfig -g 192.168.1.1 ether /net/ether0 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.0
#ip/ping 192.168.1.1
P= ings fail

#cat /net/ethe= r0/adder
successfully returns a MAC address
<= /div>

(Yes, ether0 is the PCIE= card and not the integrated NIC)

Notably the Rx/Tx lights on the SFP port do not light up at all. = Networking and the activity lights work perfectly fine on Ubuntu out-the-bo= x, so the hardware is fine.

9front does at least recognise the device exists, which is a star= t. Any suggestions on how to resolve this?
------=_Part_8832_375978252.1712257824716--