From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_NAME_MR_MRS,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EF7215C3 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 23:34:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from w4.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.165]) by 9front; Thu Apr 4 17:32:19 -0400 2024 Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by w4.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8BD1060235 for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 21:32:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1712266336; s=s1; d=tutamail.com; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=VR8yzTd5L4Zvd7tyDAVXqbAwc9N2HGWTGdDrbHfnBvE=; b=qWzdVX9TmI+BUiousx46o9mF0weE+d2rqG5w3ijPiDNv7o83fZqJJbSEUl8L9Seo s2l9Ee2yc9w8qUN5J7SO89Iv9MAu+6DfXPymURamU5iXWFY2SVeJawsoBcogucKufIW TeSSKHixT1c9WoJxThV14UbU1AiX+QOUL4w/eMD7ukOYkOYtwbMdcNsxNcDuATugYdU VnvCthcfa0DyvZY4NNOKYgS2QgeUNeEh/Lz0jP3K0vq+gpzco5EM4U1umGavrwbkigq wOMovvCZSBLPH9QHdO62Z08UBBCrio2xJQfQGFV1M/Fn9fnq5GgcjZ2vRtTmlGo2iZQ tN73T+1DPw== Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 23:32:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Mr Neuralwright To: 9front <9front@9front.org> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1B93E530C6703688BD56070231A8492B@eigenstate.org> References: <1B93E530C6703688BD56070231A8492B@eigenstate.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3341_301210595.1712266337044" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: virtualized service method strategy rails deep-learning backend Subject: Re: [9front] 10Gbit PCIE Intel 85299-1SFP Troubleshooting Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk ------=_Part_3341_301210595.1712266337044 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable %pci -v 1.0.0: net 02.00.00 8086/10fb 255 0:4f880004 524288 2:00004001 32 4:4f90000= 4 16384 Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection In my SFP port is an SFP to RJ45 copper module, it is a unbranded generic 1= 0/100/1000Base-T, confirmed to work on Ubuntu.=C2=A0 4 Apr 2024, 22:05 by ori@eigenstate.org: > % pci -v > > 1.0.0:=09net 02.00.00 8086/1557 11 0:e030000c 524288 2:0000f001 32 4:e0= 38000c 16384 > Intel Corporation 82599 10 Gigabit Network Connection > > This card works for me out of the box, with a 10g sfp. > What specific PCI id do you have? what SFP? > > This is going to take some debugging. > > Quoth Mr Neuralwright : > >> Hi All, >> I have recently acquired a=C2=A010Gbit PCIE Intel 85299-1SFP network car= d since this chipset is supported in 9front, although now I suspect the dri= ver may have only RJ45 port variants of=C2=A085299 supported, and not SFP -= hopefully I'm wrong and I'm just missing something. >> >> #ip/ipconfig >> "no success with DHCP* >> >> #ip/ipconfig -g 192.168.1.1 ether /net/ether0 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.= 0 >> #ip/ping 192.168.1.1 >> Pings fail >> #cat /net/ether0/adder >> successfully returns a MAC address >> >> (Yes, ether0 is the PCIE card and not the integrated NIC) >> Notably the Rx/Tx lights on the SFP port do not light up at all. Network= ing and the activity lights work perfectly fine on Ubuntu out-the-box, so t= he hardware is fine. >> >> 9front does at least recognise the device exists, which is a start. Any = suggestions on how to resolve this? >> ------=_Part_3341_301210595.1712266337044 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
%pci -v
<snip>
=
1.0.0: net 02.00.00 8086/10fb 255 0:4f880004 524288 2:000= 04001 32 4:4f900004 16384
Intel Corporation 8259= 9ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection

<= /div>
In my SFP port is an SFP to RJ45 copper module, it i= s a unbranded generic 10/100/1000Base-T, confirmed to work on Ubuntu. =

4 Apr 2024, 22:05 by or= i@eigenstate.org:
% pci -v
<snip>
1.0.0:=09net 02.00.00 8086/1557 11 0:e030000c 524288 2:0000f= 001 32 4:e038000c 16384
Intel Corporation 82599= 10 Gigabit Network Connection

This card works for me out of the box, with a 10g sfp.
=
What specific PCI id do you have? what SFP?

This is going to take some debugg= ing.

Quoth Mr Neural= wright <neuralwright@tutamail.com>:
Hi All,
I have recently acquired a 10= Gbit PCIE Intel 85299-1SFP network card since this chipset is supported in = 9front, although now I suspect the driver may have only RJ45 port variants = of 85299 supported, and not SFP - hopefully I'm wrong and I'm just mis= sing something.

#ip/= ipconfig
"no success with DHCP*

#ip/ipconfig -g 192.168.1.1 ether /n= et/ether0 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.0
#ip/ping 1= 92.168.1.1
Pings fail
#cat /net/ether0/adder
successfully returns a M= AC address

(Yes, eth= er0 is the PCIE card and not the integrated NIC)
Notably the Rx/Tx lights on the SFP port do not light up at all. Networkin= g and the activity lights work perfectly fine on Ubuntu out-the-box, so the= hardware is fine.

9= front does at least recognise the device exists, which is a start. Any sugg= estions on how to resolve this?

------=_Part_3341_301210595.1712266337044--