From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21483215C4 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 19:03:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Sun Apr 7 13:02:27 -0400 2024 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706; t=1712509338; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tJ+VW2t1dcRjINVihFbrt/rR4IKKDz0gqArKZ7Fc7so=; b=o70DbRn0apM5hM8JgOGe8hpyuvM6kF5ssT3PrdZjE8QgVzotcAfR0lYX2BRSwJx74KSOao nL5Kw5DOT6arpXg8zcSJVdy/ObfgEG93PVfjQZLFViMn3wE2K6lpZGHOKEc7k+YZSqMSUo J/WO8/1sg6a6qyDm8laQAsgla9XLKy4= Received: from localhost (wopr.sciops.net [local]) by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id d64a4e61; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 10:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 10:02:18 -0700 From: Kurt H Maier To: "Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)" Cc: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: "Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)" , 9front@9front.org References: <37_SdgKfn22mapMSQ9N0vLD2I5xEwg8PlsWufRcP6RmucjZLxvGsf2Wjo4UmOvgaSh3HpJh8HAvfhSMSGwdNnoqofOqtd7EGZk6PyO0MPcY=@protonmail.com> <5f0b93d67d15366f@orthanc.ca> <5f0b967c15681b0e@orthanc.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5f0b967c15681b0e@orthanc.ca> List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: transactional transactional session singleton-oriented element controller Subject: Re: [9front] Expired SSL certificate Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 09:47:30AM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) wrote: > > If the hg tree is dead and the commit history is also available > in git, then yes, I would say decommissioning hg is the right > thing to do. That way, if newcomers are exploring for Plan 9 > code, they won't be mislead by ancient creaky code. This is almost the case. Two mitigating factors: 1) 9front's sysupdate utility used to pull from this server, so we left it online so people who sysupdate infrequently would still be able to smoothly transition to git, and 2) 9front is not the only repository on the mercurial server, and people can migrate off it at their own pace (or never, as far as I care). > This frustrated me with Plan9port for a long time. 37+ different > repos ... which one do I believe? There is no way to make everyone happy. Even when we had one code server there were still supergeniuses out there who could not differentiate between the 9front repository (i.e. the one that had '9front' in the name) and the other repositories (i.e. the ones that did not have '9front' in the name). It's a hard world out there. The people who benefit from code.9front.org/hg remaining online get those benefits regardless of the certificate status. It's no concern of anyone's else, since the website, documentation, and source code have all been updated to point to git.9front.org. khm