From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66E32129B for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:54:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Thu Feb 15 08:53:23 -0500 2024 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org; s=20200506; t=1708005201; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=X89db0bmT6E+WlM7escTrI11FrGXuJIoxcJrHAOxOHc=; b=g0cNY2pNo3AEDuw/XXriGfMxpgwBil8EW7K76adsoA2FoWRytEFRutXjJbp963yt2LNfRo 09UtHrFTCUI8IUeEREhy6iiLZsPZjIQCaJrdz5hgnM81b9id1+BFYJMZKpGMVbX8oGRMbC Sp4fPLoVmYvezlYoeG6nSnedUyuAZLo= Received: from [192.168.168.200] ( [207.45.82.38]) by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id bc15a806 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:53:20 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 07:53:21 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US To: 9front@9front.org References: <63ddb3cf-e5ec-47bd-a243-3670495e873f@posixcafe.org> <58FDC930F99DB7629ACF5BDD10692ED7@eigenstate.org> From: Jacob Moody In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: basic content-addressed singleton ACPI over SOAP just-in-time content-driven-aware optimizer Subject: Re: [9front] Re: commit 671d8daa0f2d7f067b8ab3d547adbd718da93fe9 Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 2/15/24 07:34, Dave Woodman wrote: > On 15/02/2024 13:27, Jacob Moody wrote: >> On 2/15/24 05:52, hiro wrote: >>> my problem here is that colonialism still exists, and this removal >>> would trick people to beleive it doesn't, which is a common rhetoric >>> harming the colonies further. >> What present day colony of England exists? > > There are some overseas territories, but no colonies - however this may > not be Hiro's intent - other forms of colonialism are practised by many > countries (cultural, economic etc) and these are not necessarily to the > benefit of all... > > Not trying to provoke a debate, merely observing! > > Dave Sure, but I admit this feels a bit like a stretch. The reason the original present tense wording bothered me was that I feel like many groups have expanded a great deal of effort in order to no longer be called English colonies. So referring to them as such felt disrespectful. The original does not strike me as some commentary on modern day imperialism.