From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <musl-return-20682-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@lists.openwall.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C156A222F1
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:46:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 9928 invoked by uid 550); 21 Mar 2024 17:41:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 9894 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2024 17:41:25 -0000
Message-ID: <3243d78e-1a55-41ee-830e-86620c525823@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:45:42 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Beta
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
References: <CAPDSy+6wtOeE8MPhmzwcUBmQkCeo1EdjSNu3MA5cSC8VzDniTQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240308034740.GL4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAPDSy+6R-SWXj3Gh_hQtKPW-+uCYUhrLMO9JsaOhYVLX-pyLRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240308133102.GN4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAPDSy+5dmJwZ9EnD3Y5vF9PP15ewehYgZNbEOyX_RK8t4hsBOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240308203143.GQ4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAPDSy+4xCCR0p_d7wyV8+a3Oi7PpFL3NhLfHAspS7u63YuzNGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240308225445.GR4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAPDSy+7cAUaidEHV=E8XxJOJESzREa27ogdv3k_dBYkHxG6jBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPDSy+6wob5_zmPismnzf0AZiCTrzRTaUKeojJGsCA1bgTuwEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240321120727.GI15722@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAPDSy+6uUcm4eqozNTJfQ=VfnPneyhBQQLS+C3RtA7H9TqkA0A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+6uUcm4eqozNTJfQ=VfnPneyhBQQLS+C3RtA7H9TqkA0A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [musl] mDNS in musl

On 21/03/24 14:50, David Schinazi wrote:
> My apologies, it wasn't clear to me that these options had been formally 
> rejected, I'm not familiar with the musl process. Unfortunately, the 
> choice of off-by-default doesn't follow the relevant standards and, more 
> importantly for me, doesn't solve the use case that got me interested in 
> working on this.

Keep in mind that distributions do and will change the default behavior 
of software components as they see fit anyway so if your use-case is 
having a desktop oriented distribution using musl support mDNS out of 
box, having the feature default off in musl would not make impossible 
having the distro default having it on.

lu

PS: which are the stakeholders contacted while the relevant standards 
brought in such hazardous default?