From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4DF922164 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 03:00:51 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 32376 invoked by uid 550); 1 Mar 2024 01:57:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 32323 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2024 01:57:06 -0000 To: Rich Felker Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com References: <27c77ce5-e31b-0c84-ff7f-9ef43b37b986@loongson.cn> <20240229222918.GX4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> From: Hongliang Wang Message-ID: <6fb99f49-e8b0-9a7c-9d16-2546bda888bf@loongson.cn> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 10:00:40 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux loongarch64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20240229222918.GX4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:AQAAf8AxTRO8NuFljlZLAA--.4201S3 X-CM-SenderInfo: pzdqwxxrqjzxhdqjqz5rrqw2lrqou0/ X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uk129KBj9xXoW7Xw1DXr43Cr1kJFW7JF4kXwc_yoWfXrg_Wa 1jkw4DGw4DZa1DKw45tr45t3s7Gay7Xr95XFykWw4SvryfXry8JFWrG393Zr1jvayvya4r Cr1jy3s7uFy3CosvyTuYvTs0mTUanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUj1kv1TuYvT s0mT0YCTnIWjqI5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfYxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT9fnUUI cSsGvfJTRUUUbxAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20x vaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW8JVW5JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W8JVWxJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26F4j6r4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_ Gr1j6F4UJwAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc804VCY07AIYIkI8VC2zVCFFI0UMc 02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUGVWUXwAv7VC2z280aVAF wI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48IcVAKI48JMxk0xIA0c2IEe2xFo4 CEbIxvr21l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG 67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1Y6r17MI IYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E 14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJV W8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07UWHqcU UUUU= Subject: Re: [musl] LoongArch: delete bits/ptrace.h ÔÚ 2024/3/1 ÉÏÎç6:29, Rich Felker дµÀ: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 03:27:07PM +0800, Hongliang Wang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Delete loongarch64/bits/ptrace.h, the PTRACE related macro definitions >> are not used in loongarch. > > I'm applying this based on being unable to find macros like these in > the glibc loongarch64 target, but for future reference, please include > with patches like this an explanation of why they're being removed -- > whether they were originally added by mistake, or added intentionally > but then it was decided not to support them, or whatever. > > Rich > Sorry, it was my mistake that I didn't explain the reason clearly. Initialy, these macros in ptrace.h were ported with reference to mips, they are not used in loongarch, so they were originally added by mistake. Thank you for pointing out the issue. Regards, Hongliang Wang