Thanks for replying!

That fixed it.

I'm surprised, however, that this is required given that in this case
swprintf() operates on wchars exclusively -- taking wchar arguments and
producing wchar output. I'd expect that in the worst case scenario it would
have to convert from single chars to wide chars, but never the other way
around, so the representation requirement seems strange. That setlocale()
step also doesn't seem to be needed with glibc.

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 5:50 PM Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:

> On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 12:39:35AM -0400, Konstantin Isakov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following program:
> >
> > ===================================
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > #include <wchar.h>
> >
> > int main()
> > {
> >   wchar_t buf[ 32 ];
> >
> >   swprintf( buf, sizeof( buf ) / sizeof( *buf ), L"ab\u00E1c" );
> >
> >   for ( wchar_t * p = buf; *p; ++p )
> >     printf( "%u\n", ( unsigned ) *p );
> >
> >   return 0;
> > }
> > ===================================
> >
> > With musl 1.2.2 produces the following output:
> > 97
> > 98
> >
> > The expected output is:
> > 97
> > 98
> > 225
> > 99
> >
> > With musl, only the first two characters ('a' and 'b') are processed, and
> > the string ends on a Unicode character (U+00E1, which is an 'a' with
> acute
> > accent), instead of outputting it and the last character, 'c'.
> >
> > Please CC me when replying. Thanks!
>
> You need to call setlocale(LC_CTYPE, ""). Otherwise the character
> \u00e1 is unrepresentable, because POSIX requires the C locale be
> single-byte and you're in the C locale until you call setlocale, and
> thus produces an encoding error (EILSEQ).
>
> Rich
>