From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53B5E26743 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 22:54:53 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 27743 invoked by uid 550); 9 Mar 2024 21:50:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 27722 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2024 21:50:46 -0000 Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2024 21:44:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Thorsten Glaser X-X-Sender: tg@herc.mirbsd.org To: Alejandro Colomar cc: Guillem Jover , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, musl@lists.openwall.com, libbsd@lists.freedesktop.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" , "Skyler Ferrante (RIT Student)" , Iker Pedrosa , Christian Brauner In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20240309150258.GS4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Content-Language: de-Zsym-DE-1901-u-em-text-rg-denw-tz-utc, en-Zsym-GB-u-cu-eur-em-text-fw-mon-hc-h23-ms-metric-mu-celsius-rg-denw-tz-utc-va-posix MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Subject: Re: [musl] Re: Tweaking the program name for functions Alejandro Colomar dixit: >You could say it's >glibc and musl's fault, for importing the err.h functions without >importing setprogname(3). In the BSD world, where these APIs >originated, they seem to be configurable portably (within BSDs). And Nope. They are rather new, there are BSDs without them (where =E2=80=9Cextern const char *__progname;=E2=80=9D is still used). bye, //mirabilos --=20 FWIW, I'm quite impressed with mksh interactively. I thought it was much *much* more bare bones. But it turns out it beats the living hell out of ksh93 in that respect. I'd even consider it for my daily use if I hadn't wasted half my life on my zsh setup. :-) -- Frank Terbeck in #!/bin/mksh