From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C63629CEE for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:18:14 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 16262 invoked by uid 550); 12 Mar 2024 17:14:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 16224 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2024 17:14:01 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openadk.org; s=2022; t=1710263881; bh=KCCg42NiCpTum99IVj6NGdOKDjsoUqFbwXSfbV6LMBA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OH7zHaIXhvFox04bfmNpXNF1LBEI41STKMQQwV//+2xqOEVAP1rzB/QO0cPrthBd9 7co9hRybQ8USUJ5DiZa1ReLx4a3lZsAC74xoyw5gplk7y5ymdxxytEn0RNM5qgoD4i NGs0+3yefjQFbwpCpoatUmRoLyh0nAuiI5ACmIRL7w4teNPjC9WRp99Y3442C91PJn Mg4eNaye0k8R7jWGXQYE/Fvfqy1sdGz6o0SJBFyDwRkjEft0Ybej4+9G374mf7hM7Z SZr8kO81gwVKcOOSEFICPgDxc064Sx/sMhBhi8UprFINyaou5sJHUEnaEv1nf+t2DX SWtIWjQADk8pA== Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:18:01 +0100 From: Waldemar Brodkorb To: musl@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: References: <20240312005150.GB4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4f5abddd-09f9-f05f-6cc6-719fc365b449@loongson.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Linux 5.10.0-27-amd64 x86_64 Subject: Re: [musl] loongarch64 atomics not working? Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Glaser wrote, > Waldemar Brodkorb dixit: > > >lixing wrote, > > >> We've tested static and dynamic build mksh with commit id > >> cbb8a0196aab53165a35339fd91ade599d184f both works ok. > > That’s great to hear! > > >Can you check with qemu-system-loongarch64? I use gcc 13.2.0, > >binutils 2.42 and Linux 6.6.18 with the defconfig provided. > >Qemu is also 8.2.2. Can you provide your QEMU_EFI.fd for download? > > Perhaps to distinguish between emulation/runtime and toolchain > faults you could send each other the mksh binaries (if statically > linked, otherwise probably them plus musl’s dynamic parts)? Statically linked mksh from me is here: https://debug.openadk.org/mksh best regards Waldemar