From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from second.openwall.net (second.openwall.net [193.110.157.125]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B24C3259AB for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 01:09:17 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 28303 invoked by uid 550); 9 Mar 2024 00:05:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 28271 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2024 00:05:13 -0000 From: James Cloos To: Rich Felker Cc: Paul Eggert , musl@lists.openwall.com, tz@iana.org In-Reply-To: <20240308190243.GP4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (Rich Felker's message of "Fri, 8 Mar 2024 14:02:44 -0500") References: <87edcqv69m.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <20240305201247.GE4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <87wmqgpfcq.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <87r0gopc9g.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <77902F3C-198B-49BD-AB75-383A7FF45548@sonic.net> <87msrcpayi.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <20240308190243.GP4163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC Copyright: Copyright 2024 James Cloos OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6; url=https://jhcloos.com/public_key/0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6.asc OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6 Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 19:09:03 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [musl] Re: [tz] Weird PST8PDT and EST5EDT behavior on Alpine Linux >>>>> "PE" == Paul Eggert writes: >>>>> "RF" == Rich Felker writes: PE> EST5EDT,M3.2.0,M11.1.0 RF> Yes, this i the form I've used in the past before we had zoneinfo RF> support. now that i think about it (it has been >5 years since i got that clock) i ended up with that form, too. but then changed the setting to match the manufacturer's subsequent recommendation. (it was long enough ago that i had to ssh into the clock and grep(1) /etc to remind myself of its tz configuration...) -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: https://jhcloos.com/0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6.asc