From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [50.116.15.146]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34A522349 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 01:17:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C300842816; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 10:17:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562BB42801 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 10:17:26 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=makerlisp.com; s=s1-ionos; t=1711239445; x=1711844245; i=luther.johnson@makerlisp.com; bh=9vQt77/Rpy9NOf6CaoPnKb7I3PRqQdmOr5ZLA7jIhoA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TyXWU6fSUcTk5umjiR7VxipAAPYxUq5ykTPIfCoVA2moNZewdgMbpILKDv/naNyq OXUQDiX8NoB3uuDWJF08YXmDf+QiboP3uoV78Ee1HVjOumuvAYfqMX3YitKoZL6kG Ab+wfY4uijuBcq+u9xjNDHXfmTefwowuj9W/l7DkjUD9g6Rxz4EN/jEfa8ETMHk+6 BITTxidBQ5W/amLSfKjxAyzb+Fync08d/H7dJu48Dvkwdp3KSDncjYqjdB0ySmYp9 MTM0L6tNlxAj7deG/1QGzRfYAE3IQbKAMP4aLM5+BQEX4p9YA6TtbpFsnQ33nFTdu qFdDVmn6K0PqlN7siw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 55c96926-9e95-11ee-ae09-1f7a4046a0f6 Received: from makerlispvps ([74.208.29.250]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus003 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MXJY3-1rHtaa0E0z-00WAoM for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 01:17:25 +0100 Received: from [192.168.234.134] (unknown [172.56.208.79]) by makerlispvps (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6869F8B721 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 00:17:24 +0000 (UTC) To: tuhs@tuhs.org References: <7D65B884BDE2EE11A8F800155D08821210B2@SGMCEXCH> From: Luther Johnson Message-ID: <257e33f8-1ab9-37a1-cd7b-072ed20b5528@makerlisp.com> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:17:22 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7D65B884BDE2EE11A8F800155D08821210B2@SGMCEXCH> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:dlX6983l/9ZTMd3fI9P5TS9xZY4c71FdibnjGiEwNOFJUcKYF5l zyf76AS6Q6EM639Km+qyMG0HuAeWXjs+BolT1IbpxueITO4uwFBBXZu2eabnBzjMcmpt3jZ KBnhf7VpOQZL0025VcvtHZ0+VHd8Kig8Ombyi9bnQ2VUBcymoJqOaU28uNQHgVjsuI1iWFF 1ADeLc/z89xNk4j3mPwRg== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:uJ93GnfDYTU=;l0okJ9LokV4QfaBZEzF+Q6oJl9d St1VHBWoM/NrfcnEPNOBdo0YuDafT0wTqpXWY/9i3JH+8b0Ct9ST6Gfjm8F0OdOn8575dtseR Zmai/1ZtXklClta9hrOpHctwF3UZzoBzOtjPtQjIF+5bKJToW6gHq9j1Yg4F234cHvJyqA+Rx Y18kU1lMfVZrcSKOYXOj9JhiqjoriMQLqVJQhM1AFDwb26Bi5qdSWeqw3jAkC6oFnfWKptX9a EFU/t6+3kfiqCBbG2qieew9Oq9ndB8+EkacDeRbXEeMRRgXcgd095NsGOpy8qxKjs5Iclr61x eTcJ7KRPYE/YN01aa8OYZNmbQm/Ep9KT0af1ESgIH1S/YxebaQCZOmlG5wQmKR9kYm20U7ZDr cnUhRuHblvr208bJJK2CF45DlE2PaEvJHvVvAv0OtVEpeTNUW9hRcxF3ZwqXGLBpIzNhHu+v4 Txt2oY2M1iy1lbOT57DERb66sK7CZD5I5A8LpUxDBWvDduWAhiAsOrejtJ7ab6nH6tNGWgASl 7/rNDaOSuNejuTKhNe30HIEF8t8Orc2t2vZbpJqpmwTBEDjmlgLh1Q+y7a9MkUmJZSPLDTgjT haJmoVCMvDSdihUYdfxTTenKPR2GTfonUiUlsCMwW7tDIU8CY1j7HRTV9gkaSWitmo0HCQSBi GfFJBwz2HUXAl3tqlcl3xRk8LtEs40y4Bcy/g4ulySVqplsuF8+zoULkEPCzewdZlLgExVRaC 5mzVburqxyjfKA5xM7WnKvXIztVD9WFu95Uk9TYy17+Ys5LvMBiRRo= Message-ID-Hash: HCPL7OQM5ONVCKBNUZN66LUXSDJ2QYXY X-Message-ID-Hash: HCPL7OQM5ONVCKBNUZN66LUXSDJ2QYXY X-MailFrom: luther.johnson@makerlisp.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: 386 PCC List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: I think it's a better than even chance that the C compilers in the first versions of SCO and ISC Unix were based on PCC, you might look there. On 03/23/2024 05:13 PM, Jason Stevens wrote: > I'd been on this whole rabbithole exploration thing of those MIT PCC 808= 6 > uploads that have been on the site & on bitsavers, it had me wondering i= s > there any version of PCC that targeted the 386? > > While rebuilding all the 8086 port stuff, and MIT PC/IP was fun, it'd be > kind of interesting to see if anything that ancient could be forced to w= ork > with a DOS Extender.. > > I know there was the Anders Magnusson one in 2007, although the site is = now > offline. But surely there must have been another one between 1988/2007? > > Thanks! > >