From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tuhs-bounces@tuhs.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:146::1])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2094422B7E
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Fri,  8 Mar 2024 06:54:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FB6434B6;
	Fri,  8 Mar 2024 15:54:04 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from junk.nocrew.org (junk.nocrew.org [51.15.56.219])
	by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94C92434B5
	for <tuhs@tuhs.org>; Fri,  8 Mar 2024 15:54:00 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=junk.nocrew.org)
	by junk.nocrew.org with esmtps  (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.93)
	(envelope-from <lars@nocrew.org>)
	id 1riTB8-00Bwk2-5C; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 05:53:58 +0000
From: Lars Brinkhoff <lars@nocrew.org>
To: Tom Lyon <pugs78@gmail.com>
Organization: nocrew
References: <CANxB0bRF9WqY8=tLXGUfeFQGjqHfYVZ-hFDngn+kDL_Hr6pWrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2024 05:53:57 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CANxB0bRF9WqY8=tLXGUfeFQGjqHfYVZ-hFDngn+kDL_Hr6pWrg@mail.gmail.com>
	(Tom Lyon's message of "Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:14:12 -0800")
Message-ID: <7wsf11qney.fsf@junk.nocrew.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: lars@nocrew.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on junk.nocrew.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Message-ID-Hash: UHO3MKS5J3CRIZP2IPPV4AI3H3S4GDWA
X-Message-ID-Hash: UHO3MKS5J3CRIZP2IPPV4AI3H3S4GDWA
X-MailFrom: lars@nocrew.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: TUHS main list <tuhs@tuhs.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1
Precedence: list
Subject: [TUHS] Re: History of non-Bell C compilers?
List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list <tuhs.tuhs.org>
Archived-At: <https://www.tuhs.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/tuhs@tuhs.org/message/UHO3MKS5J3CRIZP2IPPV4AI3H3S4GDWA/>
List-Archive: <https://www.tuhs.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/tuhs@tuhs.org/>
List-Help: <mailto:tuhs-request@tuhs.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tuhs-owner@tuhs.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tuhs@tuhs.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tuhs-join@tuhs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tuhs-leave@tuhs.org>

Tom Lyon writes:
> For no good reason, I've been wondering about the early history of C
> compilers that were not derived from Ritchie, Johnson, and Snyder at Bell. 

I'm not sure to what extent the Snyder compiler was done at Bell.
It's using a Yacc with a strange syntax, and when asked, Steve Johnson
said he didn't recognize it.