> > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 5:16 PM Erik E. Fair wrote: > > Line printers are distinguished not by the width of the paper but by the >> printer having enough print heads to print an entire line of output at a >> time. That speed advantage made them the preferred output device for >> many-page program listings, as opposed to a teleprinter terminals which >> were more suitable for interactive computing. >> > There were originally two styles, the drum printers which DEC sold(e.g. > LP20) and the chain printers that IBM offered (e.g. 1401). The drum had > all the characters in each of the 132 columns (the upper case only printers > were faster because the alphabet was on the drum in two places). The IBM ones > has slugs on a rapidly spinning chain that was horizontal (and parallel) > to the line being printed. The chain was easily replaceable by the > operator - which was one of the duties we would have. When a user queued a > printer a set of symbols (*i.e.* the chain of the needed output > characters) was specified and the system queued it until the printer had > been properly provisioned. For instance, CMU printed checks with a > special chain and film ink, so once a night the operator would configure > the printer, and tell the queue to print them). Some chains were faster > than others, the standard one had N copies of each character. > > In common to both schemes is that each both styles had 132 hammers and > when the proper character was in the position needed, the hammer fired to > make an impression the ribbon on the paper, which was caused the noise > people associated with computer printers. The high-end IBM 1401 had a > hydraulic cover that came down over it and was controlled by the channel > processor (it would auto-open when it needed to be serviced - like a new > box of paper). > > This led to the "first commandment of fancy printers": Thou shalt not leave thine coffee on top of the printer. -- jpl