From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:146::1]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B4B2C58D for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:55:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364514288A; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:55:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A3942889 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:55:37 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d24a727f78so443481fa.0 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 07:55:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710255335; x=1710860135; darn=tuhs.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yvdNvapt61ntBF9L9Kez5Wb+c8lHbGkO5WKYh7I+56U=; b=MF+TH0yLRH6ko3LMr3HvVzEc4XRu62X9LZfj7bjlx78l9trRimmUa7v7r+JvIQiRvX CtuX7BohI08Fh4Bu4g6kkaxKzJaREItTfj0sN83FhWuLNwKLQQOFKp8tHfAnNBMJt6L+ 5Xgx8O9WQb+tiPX7PJs5OucRqCpICFxgjyVfwyNuu5mSxmLQyXXBGZwN8q/rg5uM5EGl mdIGt5GRk6lCqapzQwkdqgPhRz4YsxHD0yyc9N6I6jicFPdzPepk8tqGqgYyHKt6wzZ6 AD3ai0/cZf9p96QgXv9f32i6W04djU3tuwPy3IYT/YocQgwmD0TaHpbpFfBTvFFnOhnT ZRXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710255335; x=1710860135; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=yvdNvapt61ntBF9L9Kez5Wb+c8lHbGkO5WKYh7I+56U=; b=EV5yDaVUnroNFuxIBJxwDAl4aBfXLk9eVXgdK9Gib+QU/7uF3jmbZc3nyZRVwIx7Vg 1kmly6pa0nRDT9JP0RTERCm6tNkhHwLIiTYczKz2AcPj5h1qlBj/z3CYaCgKatMeLHY/ rAseKP7ubvO/r69+Eb+GlMdNOq/c7FrXFNlkULHP0GTzEDKP2Xs44X6lk+a1gRJjc7OF WOIRyGlRlrbJjP98Wj1/QD9OAfBjj8zz5GNG2EAxtjDQpN5KEd2PAJuZ9GLsU7fPrjkc 1I36r3So8kkgoKn8KBvATiiPOfYyRH0oBJA+vTnzVe4t0t3sOrczSjcJSDlMKSxvGHW1 vqvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzUry0XG5mvrsuHA14CTvpg1HNRXstQxlcH9SURqoWvWZQIWz9V iSaZPoelzF9Kc6XcV3qbnAebfRWHWaa+A3XcTxVmnWKq+ZeA0gxkybqOw+GHhxoA3s8sB7jX5yu Dgh00Jbaxms+k70lllDlgJBGWris= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHbLulbkU70Rf1ubnGBYDbjdvE7gl+5DPoaiF7wR/3J0dFlVs82sgLSKoOTOWXgHBO9mAHmUp1ZHe1Js7Jsgpk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:2118:b0:2d4:6854:7b92 with SMTP id a24-20020a05651c211800b002d468547b92mr326216ljq.3.1710255335030; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 07:55:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <12CFE503-ACC8-44B5-BA41-28DB5450E521@planet.nl> In-Reply-To: From: Henry Bent Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:55:22 -0400 Message-ID: To: Marc Rochkind Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b84827061377d9dc" Message-ID-Hash: HK22N7Q3QNTRBVJUYXVLZRLKUJLHXJPM X-Message-ID-Hash: HK22N7Q3QNTRBVJUYXVLZRLKUJLHXJPM X-MailFrom: henry.r.bent@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: "tuhs@tuhs.org" X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: History of non-Bell C compilers? List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --000000000000b84827061377d9dc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 08:02, Marc Rochkind wrote: > Since it came up in this thread, here's my review of Coherent in BYTE > Magazine (1985): > > https://www.mrochkind.com/mrochkind/docs/Byte-Pick-Coherent-Theos.pdf > This is an impressively thorough review from an end-user perspective, and I am sorry that it was buried so far back in that issue of Byte! Though I suppose this was from the era when Byte was jam-packed with informative reviews. Did you continue to use Coherent, or do you have any thoughts on the article in hindsight? -Henry --000000000000b84827061377d9dc Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 08:02, Marc Rochki= nd <mrochkind@gmail.com> w= rote:
Since it came up in this thread, here's m= y review of Coherent in BYTE Magazine (1985):


This is an im= pressively thorough review from an end-user perspective, and I am sorry tha= t it was buried so far back in that issue of Byte!=C2=A0 Though I suppose t= his was from the era when Byte was jam-packed with informative reviews.=C2= =A0 Did you continue to use Coherent, or do you have any thoughts on the ar= ticle in hindsight?

-Henry
--000000000000b84827061377d9dc--