VP/ix ran on both System III and UNIX System V/386 Release 3.2. I do still have a copy of the VP/ix Environment documentation and the diskettes for the software. I have the "Introduction to the VP/ix Environment" for further reference for interested folks. Also found some information about VP/ix on these web pages:     1. https://virtuallyfun.com/2020/11/29/fun-with-vp-ix-under-interactive-unix-system-v-386-3-0-and-86box/     2. https://techmonitor.ai/technology/interactive_systems_is_adding_to_vpix_with_a_little_help_from_its_friends     3. https://manualzz.com/doc/7267897/interactive-unix-system-v-386-r3.2-v4.1---release It's been a long time since I looked at this. Heinz On 3/13/2024 8:53 AM, Clem Cole wrote: > Thanks.  Fair enough.  You mentioned PC/IX as /ISC's System III/ > > I'm not sure I ever ran ISC's System III port—only the V.3 port - > which was the basis for their ATT, Intel, and IBM work and later sold > directly. I'm fairly sure ISCalso called that port PC/IX, but they > might have added something to say with 386 in the name—I've forgotten. > [Heinz probably can clarify here]. Anyway, this is likely the source > of my thinking. FWIW: The copy of PC/IX for the 386 (which I still > have on a system I have not booted in ages) definitely has VPIX. > ᐧ > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 11:28 AM Marc Rochkind > wrote: > > @Clem Cole , > > I don't remember what it was. But, the XT had an 8088, so > certainly no 386 technology was involved. > > Marc > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 8:38 AM Clem Cole wrote: > > @Marc > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 1:18 PM Marc Rochkind > wrote: > > At a trade show, I bought a utility that allowed me to run > PC-DOS under PC/IX. I'm sure it wasn't a virtual machine. > Rather, it just swapped back and forth. (Guessing a bit > there.) > > Hmm ... you sure it was not either VPIX or DOS/Merge -- ISC > built VPIX in cooperation with the Phoenix Tech folks for > PC/IX. I always bought a copy with it, but it may have been an > option.   LCC did DOS/Merge originally as part of the AIX work > for IBM and would become a core part of OS/2 Warp IIRC. Both > Merge and VPIX had some rough edges but certainly worked fine > for DOS 3.3 programs. The issue tended to be Win and DOS > graphics-based programs/games that played fast and loose, > bypassing the DOS OS interface and accessing the HW directly.  > For instance, I never got the flight simulator (Air War over > Germany) for Dad's WWII plane (P-47 Thunderbolt) to run under > either (i.e., only under DOS directly on the HW. FWIW: In that > mode, Dad said the simulator flew a lot like how he remembered > it). > > Both Merge and VPIX used the 386 VM support and a bunch of > work in the core OS.   Heinz would have to fill us in here. > The version of the 386 port ISC delivered to AT&T and Intel > only had the kernel changes to allow the VM support for VPIX > to be linked in, but it was not there.   IICR (and I'm not > sure I am) is that Merge could run on PC/IX also, but you had > to replace a couple of kernel modules.  It certainly would > work on the AT&T and Intel versions. > ᐧ > > > > -- > /My new email address is mrochkind@gmail.com/ >