From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from zero.zsh.org (zero.zsh.org [IPv6:2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9880224B0B for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 08:46:48 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:MIME-Version:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=qTIRQu5QfUZk+2SGEVtAy74lGbwJMbcQ4E/VARTd81c=; b=MlEgeJUNn9HppUOjLMElNIQpAe 1RNNcL7ZdAILNjbyjooz4xsNW3sP0dPwAN/Y12zrwW2yiwU0JyG3ZjclczrbKrR2cL1MJ3o/sxp5/ HlA+3xZwpUAWJx10i5RBlusiwJRme1hHArMjN1oJHylefX3f+oRCsVD5dGCh68pHbVP9bHcHJmmBn HESQeOdIMF92qrnjbZmquAVwZ8pYp1PJk5n45SCX9xug0hmvTnN6BaAW1YhywM2yRueovx70HpaOn 1jYbTNbWYOjUThPbcLPgZBnBl0PixlwbTHvdnfDjF8F//P1pFs4AWY5jvTw5LOvsxe5vEjsnTNjKC XHgJlRjg==; Received: by zero.zsh.org with local id 1rrXux-000KKX-TT; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 06:46:47 +0000 Received: by zero.zsh.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1rrXue-000K0V-0d; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 06:46:29 +0000 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13A11200043; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 02:46:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap48 ([10.202.2.98]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Apr 2024 02:46:25 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudefuddgudduvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesthdtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepnfgr fihrvghntggvucggvghljoiiqhhuvgiiuceolhgrrhhrhihvseiishhhrdhorhhgqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelkeehjefgudefgeekueegudeghfevvdeljeehieeuffehveej gfehtefhudevhfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehlrghrrhihvhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidquddu hedukeejjedtgedqudduledvjeefkeehqdhlrghrrhihvheppeiishhhrdhorhhgsehfrg hsthhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iaa214773:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6B55B31A0065; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 02:46:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-333-gbfea15422e-fm-20240327.001-gbfea1542 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1304fd59-088a-4f9b-a235-5c7d612b1623@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20240305065606.ccr2ieheahslcpye@chazelas.org> <20240306175711.t3uz2sery3b6tbjw@chazelas.org> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 02:45:56 -0400 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Lawrence_Vel=C3=A1zquez?= To: "Bart Schaefer" Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH?] Nofork and removing newlines Content-Type: text/plain X-Seq: 52870 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: , List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 2:02 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote: > I'm leaving this in the same discussion thread because I just noticed > that ${|...} and ${ cmd } do not really respect the > IGNORE_CLOSE_BRACES option. Setting that option changes handling of > unbalanced braces (and I'm not yet sure if it does so in a sensible > way) but does not force use of the semicolon e.g. in ${ cmd; } which > theoretically it should. Is this worth trying to work in? It would be greatly preferable if IGNORE_CLOSE_BRACES were respected, so that we don't have yet another exception that has to be documented and watched out for. However, I can't opine on whether it'd be worth doing, since I don't know how hard it'd be and won't be working on it in any case. (Sorry if this has already been settled; I'm just now catching up on some older threads.) -- vq