From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-45268-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@zsh.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 00aff66c
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>;
	Thu, 9 Jan 2020 10:33:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 11616 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2020 10:32:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 45268
Received: (qmail 23025 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Jan 2020 10:32:56 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from rcpt-expgw.biglobe.ne.jp by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.102.1/25684. spamassassin: 3.4.2.  
 Clear:RC:0(133.208.98.4):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. 
 Processed in 3.239885 secs); 09 Jan 2020 10:32:56 -0000
X-Envelope-From: takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at spf01.biglobe.ne.jp designates 133.208.98.4 as permitted sender)
X-Biglobe-Sender: <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
From: Jun T <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: [PATCH] find RLIM_NLIMITS correctly on Cygwin
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 19:32:17 +0900
References: <82F8CDE0-C95C-4D31-ABFC-EBB3C97799F3@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
 <bfcc331d-b892-48e2-9eac-17bfd73287ef@www.fastmail.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
In-Reply-To: <bfcc331d-b892-48e2-9eac-17bfd73287ef@www.fastmail.com>
Message-Id: <1B509B1C-A670-482F-9D88-2145E15D03A1@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Biglobe-Spnum: 60295


> 2020/01/09 6:33, Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> 
> I don't object to the patch, but we should think about actually using
> a C preprocessor to parse header files, otherwise we'd just be playing
> whack-a-mole as OS's use more features of C syntax in their header files.

Yes, but ...

When rlimits.awk finds an unknown macro RLIMIT_???, for example

#define RLIMIT_FOO	8

then it sets recs[8]="FOO", and this enables the limit builtin to print
the resource name as "FOO". *If* we need this feature, it would not be
easy to achieve by using C preprocessor alone.