From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id dec0ab76 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:59:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25056 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2019 19:35:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 44604 Received: (qmail 5421 invoked by uid 1010); 30 Jul 2019 19:35:03 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-ua1-f51.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.101.2/25524. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:0(209.85.222.51):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. Processed in 1.635731 secs); 30 Jul 2019 19:35:03 -0000 X-Envelope-From: sgniazdowski@gmail.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.222.51 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cs9G0s+44vvWtFKX0eUEDWfiVn1krS2C2LKX0kEVrNw=; b=B+ZxecY/4opxK04UoxMJfsmc1yU4grLekfMdSztC1YkEjhGSuANCrQKFMGsGvjMRnX EGrMWHIbiVHf37DcFGHXvhBlmEl2rBq9IRO4/1KoU6X6hlNBuBC3fZrg5tD/mNRnPmeY qQHh4watVlZLSqe9LKfXz4TcEdUSRPH9mIHLDdjD+JZbGYxMw4M/SAF4tfO/tKlCcbM6 DC7Rt7FTjC1KwBfDqb72lQvUfgmfOqrSg0nmeBALuCwmpcx3reVijOAJThs9Y/cIl3Bk fiME3+aQBzYcFrvQAr8IiSl6ZSQIErSGJxtHjK+mT0GUcXGgLgt2sTIpp953LvsLsAR1 2HfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cs9G0s+44vvWtFKX0eUEDWfiVn1krS2C2LKX0kEVrNw=; b=SWymezwG633Y5R8SEV7pl0VA96cUvkMfAXu61yUNPHhfy/TDqqHJLWcPvH/ulD7INn D6vflNlcmBvrWcuy28gdUHS/BUS8GKDNGKzqP8BQpBzPZ4IqKjjeERrIklcTfbQSp7kI 5J8uiB1nFfWxCFQ852YQCqhg9OrnRsdO71L1QZ1pbIIxYvkMgHs6PjH/Sk8UZT+ZOVzD 4dVt6bLdlVARki+3Rove+X9wyQie+MaN+jWw8DUEkOf+KcbLbOkvpFqVoiYxgdd6azyn bcfm2JBesvZp2TOE8qw+bH3OtnJl78kgkLECaGNIjoorqBo70waLwja6nZ5g+pFKSJ8c m6Rw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUrzIfqmi+4ctqx2eqDZCjnPcARN0xtWAAS0Z/qnSWcPexDdPpj koi21gtXklB9Bd28OtO/GQZUeXRDxkYFhIEVaoQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwwNvpzS0+/8zp5v9NDEkExxBTzZ3wlOnGmuoAsK/VE9l2IMsliPdJFuGAzVXDPjD7+zOwH0Y0mkjmowBTn3gA= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:734f:: with SMTP id k15mr43767957uap.28.1564515267975; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:34:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Sebastian Gniazdowski Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 21:34:16 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_A_serious_bug_in_execution_=E2=80=93_where_to_debug=3F?= To: Roman Perepelitsa Cc: Zsh hackers list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 21:24, Roman Perepelitsa wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 8:53 PM Sebastian Gniazdowski > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 at 20:22, Roman Perepelitsa > > wrote: > > > > > > Do you think it's possible to implement clean shutdown and reentrant > > > initialization for a piece of code as blackbox? > > > > What do you mean exactly? As a blackbox - as a regular, repeatable method? > > In order to implement clean shutdown for a piece of code with > non-trivial capabilities you have to rely on its implementation > details. You cannot implement generic clean shutdown that will work > with any code. Yeah but this is solved by the unload function that I've described in the previous post. -- Sebastian Gniazdowski News: https://twitter.com/ZdharmaI IRC: https://kiwiirc.com/client/chat.freenode.net:+6697/#zplugin Blog: http://zdharma.org