From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <000f01c31497$0a53d7f0$c901a8c0@cc77109e>
From: "Bruce Ellis" <brucee@chunder.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <20030507043633.GX36080@cassie.foobarbaz.net> <3EB8B69D.5040107@ameritech.net> <006301c31488$b478f6c0$c901a8c0@cc77109e> <3EB904CC.9000303@ameritech.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] struct problems
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed,  7 May 2003 22:47:40 +1000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a17c8e7a-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

pragmatism and a silly discussion over dinner.
hj were dicks for assuming that they could
lay out structs in an architecture independant way.
we had to live with it.

----- Original Message -----
From: "northern snowfall" <dbailey27@ameritech.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 11:06 PM
Subject: Re: [9fans] struct problems

> Bruce Ellis wrote:
>
> >what other justification for #pragma hjdicks
> >can you think of?
> >
> Extreme intoxication?