From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <000f01c34218$f6855f50$2a8be793@gli.cas.cz>
From: "pac" <cej@gli.cas.cz>
To: "9fans" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-2"
Subject: [9fans] survey
Date: Fri,  4 Jul 2003 12:42:27 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e8c1405a-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

dear folks,
i=A7m writing a paper introducing my "neXt" archive of plan9 software to
biologists. would like
to know YOUR opinion on comparison with selected other oses. hope youll t=
ake
a minute
to help me be less subjective. pls, put scores into the following table,
1=3Dworst, 5=3Dbest.

FEEL FREE TO ADD MORE LINES, if you wish ;-)

Win    Mac    Sun    SGI    Linux/BSD    Plan9

design

modularity (as opposed to "monolithicity")

networking

security

orientation to computing (as opposed to "office")

extensibility/flexibility

user friendliness


sorry to bother,
nice weekend,

++pac.