* [9fans] Should this happen?
@ 2001-04-26 6:11 lucio
2001-04-26 6:59 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: lucio @ 2001-04-26 6:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Assuming I have a fresh installation of Plan 9, up to the most recent,
suffixed 'a', patches, I get a rather ugly result in an attempt to
'mk all' in /sys/src (well, /n/other/sys/src, to be precise):
+ Thu Apr 26 07:39:07 SAT 2001
+ 8c -FVw fid.c
+ 8c -FVw file.c
+ 8c -FVw intmap.c
+ 8c -FVw req.c
+ req.c:31 structure not fully declared Reqpool
+ req.c:65 not a member of struct/union: taglock
+ req.c:68 not a member of struct/union: taglock
+ req.c:72 structure not fully declared Reqpool
+ warning: req.c:57 used and not set: nr
+ req.c:91 structure not fully declared Reqpool
+ req.c:99 structure not fully declared Reqpool
+ req.c:101 structure not fully declared Reqpool
+ warning: req.c:96 used and not set: f
+ mk: 8c -FVw req.c : exit status=rc 706:8c 708:error
+ mk: date for (i ... : exit status=rc 692:rc 695:mk 696:error
It looks like a missing or broken header file, but I have no idea
where to start looking (req.c is in /sys/src/lib9p).
++L
.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Should this happen?
2001-04-26 6:11 [9fans] Should this happen? lucio
@ 2001-04-26 6:59 ` Boyd Roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Boyd Roberts @ 2001-04-26 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
From: <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
>
> It looks like a missing or broken header file, but I have no idea
> where to start looking (req.c is in /sys/src/lib9p).
grep?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Should this happen?
2001-04-26 7:06 rsc
@ 2001-04-26 7:32 ` Lucio De Re
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lucio De Re @ 2001-04-26 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 03:06:45AM -0400, rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
>
> it shouldn't happen. check that you have the
> latest files. i believe they're in the last full
> package.
>
I believe I religiously applied to the initial distribution all
the subsequent patches (and would have been warned if I didn't do
it properly, but that needs a reality check: all the checksums seem
wrong.
While I download the most recent full archive, I'll see if I can
reproduce the entire operation. No promises, all this took place
over a long period; but I do have all the updates, I think, and
the exercise could be worthwhile.
++L
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Should this happen?
@ 2001-04-26 7:06 rsc
2001-04-26 7:32 ` Lucio De Re
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: rsc @ 2001-04-26 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
it shouldn't happen. check that you have the
latest files. i believe they're in the last full
package.
% md5sum *
0be0739b8eceb74a3a5d5a26ba97ee37 fid.c
0c861a87ccd445221a9d00979b6e8150 file.c
71244176e55314971e173b497f95c963 ftest.c
88ece2b41081aadf6a6f494b135819f4 impl.h
c7707e9a4e2a25de733984200a1b99e1 intmap.c
87a2e4b3b10043527829f9713f028227 mkfile
176ab673d5d367bfc2c47102bf98a769 ramfs.c
543666717ca6c2470684b315f87faef2 req.c
9bd07b5e24f104446c385599fdd21b54 srv.c
011607ce7a3ae627374b228b8deaa553 threadsrv.c
33f2607a632e9fac43c7b437007ec17d uid.c
09ef7d257915e8f0334bdabc78d7852f util.c
% md5sum /sys/include/9p.h
97902c256ce6846137cd3ed7fb4f59c7 /sys/include/9p.h
%
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-04-26 7:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-04-26 6:11 [9fans] Should this happen? lucio
2001-04-26 6:59 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-04-26 7:06 rsc
2001-04-26 7:32 ` Lucio De Re
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).