From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <001f01c087fa$1f34c660$0ab9c6d4@cybercable.fr>
From: "Boyd Roberts" <boyd@planete.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <200101261956.OAA30860@smtp4.fas.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: The problem with SSH2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 01:43:03 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 532e4396-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

From: <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
> it's everything else.
> you also might complain that 9P would be
> too slow, but i tried it and found that the
> small-packet latency was actually _less_
> using 9P than using native ssh on the same
> unix boxes for various networks.

surprise, surprise,  but you already knew that.