From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Patrick Kelly" <kameo76890@gmail.com>
To: <lucio@proxima.alt.za>,
	"'Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs'" <9fans@9fans.net>
References: <001e01cade3d$e250d500$a6f27f00$@gmail.com>
	<cf8238992a822a676c59586236253167@proxima.alt.za>
In-Reply-To: <cf8238992a822a676c59586236253167@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 12:26:31 -0400
Message-ID: <001f01cade4a$be647040$3b2d50c0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] Mars Needs Women (was Re:  TeX: hurrah!)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 05cec622-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 9fans-bounces@9fans.net [mailto:9fans-bounces@9fans.net] On =
Behalf Of lucio@proxima.alt.za
> Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2010 12:10 PM
> To: 9fans@9fans.net
> Subject: Re: [9fans] Mars Needs Women (was Re: TeX: hurrah!)
>=20
> > Yes there is, but the disagreement in between what I wrote, and what =
you read. In the quoted sentence, I was talking about the
> > building, or implementation, process. What you then began to talk =
about was the design process.
>=20
> Computer programming is much more design than implementation, unless =
I'm too old to keep up with new ideas and I've missed
> some radical change.  The analogy of the construction of a bridge I =
believe is closer to the real thing if one considers the design rather
> than the implementation.  Ergo...

Never said it wasn't. But you insisted on finding a part of what I said =
that you could troll, and began to troll.
You have repetitively ignored the heart of my e-mails, and even ignored =
chunks of what I've said just to criticize me.

I discussed design, and you ignored it. When I brought up =
implementation, you considered it as design.

Unless you have something constructive to say, rather than make up some =
fantastic problem in what I say, I'm done here.
=20
> ++L