From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <005801c1451f$7205a5c0$a2b9c6d4@SOMA> From: "Boyd Roberts" To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> References: <20010924172455.5597119A73@mail.cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Nextstaion as plan9 terminal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:36:29 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: f1cc3314-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > We also had continuing problems with backing out of interrupts: > the processor didn't take interrupts between instructions. Instead > you had to figure out the state of the machine and back it out by hand. > We were pretty good at this but I remember there still being a lingering > problem. reminds me of the early 68020s. apart from the n too many interrupt stacks frames there was a scary piece of assembler to mangle the frame and then resume -- nasty.