From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] killing rogue processes
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Message-id: <005c01c3c6d7$d5942530$82079486@SOMA>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312191019270.20439-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:01:18 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: acf7fe1e-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> lsof [ -?abChlnNOPRstUvVX ] [ -A A ] [ -c c ] [ +|-d d ] [ +|-D D ] [ +|-f
> [cfgGn] ] [ -F [f] ] [ -g [s] ] [ -i [i] ] [ -k k ] [ +|-L [l] ] [ -m m ]
> [ +|-M ] [ -o [o] ] [ -p s ] [ +| -r [t] ] [ -S [t] ] [ -T [t] ] [ -u s ]
> [ +|-w ] [ -- ] [names]
>
> yessirree, I'm sure we want an lsof with all them purty switches.

yeah, don't i know it.  a decent /proc would have removed the need
for it (in the '90s) and /proc existed back in '83 or '84 iirc.