From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <006301c3e336$2c475f80$8201a8c0@cc77109e> From: "Bruce Ellis" To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> References: <356618B4-4F07-11D8-B07D-000A95E29604@nas.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] Unix trampoline? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 22:27:06 +1100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: c079ae88-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 if you are looking at graphics performance then the Mac will win 'cause it doesn't have to be redirected to /dev/draw. try a real application for a real benchmark (well something that means something to you). majette's benchmark was "let's run bgp and see how long it takes to get all the stuff" (paraphrased) and then some stuff about the tardiness of the gc. things got faster, a lot faster, 'cause i had real data to work on. i haven't really answered you question. sorry, i'll go to sleep now. brucee ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Johnson" To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 6:22 PM Subject: Re: [9fans] Unix trampoline? > On Jan 20, 2004, at 7:24 AM, phillip stanley-marbell wrote: > > http://corpus-callosum.com/software.html. > > > > His Inferno 4e OSX port works splendidly. > > I just tried it, and it does. > > What's bizarre is that it seems to run noticeably faster on my wife's > iBook than it does on my Athlon under Plan 9. Anyone know of a > benchmark I could use? > > -Jack