From: "david presotto" <presotto@closedmind.org>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Virtual memory & paging
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:01:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <007d01c1ae4d$9e0c3700$0365c0d0@cc583254b> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020205105739.AF44019999@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Actually, I'ld be seriously worried about our ability to
add DLL support without major bugs. It adds a lot
of complexity that spans the VM model, security,
and compilers. A lot of Plan 9's speed and usefulness
arises from its simplicity and this would be a major step in
away from that, not that we haven't been whores
before.
A major drawback right now is that, unless we change
our MMU handling in a drastic way,
we have to run the shared library at the same addresses
in all programs. Might be a bit of a problem (unless we
go to 64 bit addressing). The current MMU
model with its lazy evaluation and no need for a
intermachine shootdown is quite elegant and I'm not sanguine
to lose it just for DLL's.
As Geoff states, we don't seem to be losing out by not
having them, vis a vis memory size. Some things would
be more efficiently done with a shared library, shared
databases for example. I'm just not yet prepared to
pay the price in increased complexity. Others may be.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-05 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-05 10:57 geoff
2002-02-05 11:37 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-02-05 14:01 ` david presotto [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-15 14:32 Richard Uhtenwoldt
2002-02-16 21:56 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-02-04 11:03 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2002-02-04 10:59 forsyth
2002-02-04 10:38 geoff
2002-02-04 11:16 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-02-04 11:45 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-02-04 17:10 ` Andrew Simmons
2002-02-05 11:17 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-03-30 4:26 ` Richard Maxwell Underwood
2002-02-05 9:53 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-05 16:06 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-02-04 10:30 forsyth
2002-02-03 23:08 geoff
2002-02-03 20:26 ` Andrew Simmons
2002-02-04 16:15 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-02-04 6:21 ` Richard Uhtenwoldt
2002-02-03 21:53 presotto
2002-02-03 22:36 ` Andrew Simmons
2002-02-03 21:21 rob pike
2002-02-04 21:46 ` skipt
2002-02-04 22:11 ` Ronald G Minnich
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202041510540.4327-100000@snaresland.acl.lan l.gov>
2002-02-05 1:30 ` skipt
2002-02-05 15:32 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-02-03 21:12 andrey mirtchovski
2002-02-03 21:01 Andrew Simmons
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='007d01c1ae4d$9e0c3700$0365c0d0@cc583254b' \
--to=presotto@closedmind.org \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).