From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:32:50 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <009d09bf2b5b2c3ccba4007fdd7b516d@ladd.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: <9b73a2f7842fdf54ca57423261c7ae78@brasstown.quanstro.net> <201109081504.36357.dexen.devries@gmail.com> <20110908194409.743FBB827@mail.bitblocks.com> <20110908203547.C1CF1B827@mail.bitblocks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] 9ttp Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1c612474-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu Sep 8 19:31:19 EDT 2011, rminnich@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote: > > Just asynchronous TClunk is enough to improve 9P's performance over > > high-latency links dramatically. > > not my experience, but I'm willing to be convinced. iirc, async clunks are dangerous. - erik