From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <00a701c41330$5810f200$8201a8c0@cc77109e>
From: "Bruce Ellis" <brucee@chunder.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <200403260945.i2Q9jFRe076976@adat.davidashen.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] is plan 9 based on XML?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:45:19 +1100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4344bf38-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

try and convince a generation of database researchers
that your first claim is right.

try and convince anyone that you can implement a
database without implicit datasets.

brucee
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Tolpin" <dvd@davidashen.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: [9fans] is plan 9 based on XML?


> > give me a break.  tell me how to do a join efficiently if
> 
> join has never been efficient with hierarchical databases.
> 
> > you are trying to treat any filesystem as a dataset.
> 
> I am not trying to treat any filesystem as a dataset.