From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <00aa01c15c8a$06340800$022bfea9@oemcomputer>
From: "rob pike" <rob@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <9r4ilv$8ac$1@newpoisson.nosc.mil>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Java for Plan 9?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:47:21 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0cc2ed98-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Java's peculiar insistence that class structure be wired into the source
file structure, coupled with the
StylisticChoiceOfNamingObjectsWithLongWindedRunOnRedundantUnreadableConfusingNames
means that you need the new 9P to get a JVM going.

-rob

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Matt Senecal <msenecal@inri.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:44 AM
Subject: [9fans] Java for Plan 9?


> Not to raise the spectre of Java over Plan 9, but has there been any attempt
> to create a Plan 9 JVM that adheres to the Java specs 100%?
>