9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Matt" <matt@proweb.co.uk>
To: <lucio@proxima.alt.za>, <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Gecko based web browser
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 18:28:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00af01bff7f0$44af15c0$02a7b6c3@lucid.proweb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000727095433.O18891@cackle.proxima.alt.za>

> > Designers, esp. the newer ones, are quite happy to use script all over
the
> > place and I think that the web will become increasingly unusable to
> > non-script enabled browsers. I've just started at a new web design shop
and
> > many of the designers there don't even know about text only browsers and
as
> > such don't always design their sites to degrade gracefully. I hope to
> > educate my new co-workers.
> >
> Why not just encourage them, to the point where more computing power
> than would put man on the moon many times over is minimally essential
> to read a web page?
>
> Surely, there must be some way to exploit this insanity?  Or is it
> just part of the growing technological gap?

Actually I find client side scripting very useful.

It prevents round trips to the web server and utilises clock cycles
otherwise wasted on the client side.

On one project I use XML to store the details of the stories available and
display hidden DIV's containing the headlines when the section headers are
mouseovered (a new word :-?).
I only have to load the headlines into the browser once when the first page
is loaded and I cn re-arrange the order of the stories as necessary (by
date, author, category etc.) without any http requests.

Clients being able to manipulate a dataset and return the results to the
server is also useful
(or it will be as soon as I can find a use for it :)

I do recognise the technology gap but the desire to execute code on the
client is a strong one and as more people utilise it beyond simple
mouseovers it will become an enriching experience.

You can develop quite sophistcated applications with the DOM and a scripting
language it's just that people have shied away from it as yet in the
internet world and kept it in the the world of the intranet where the
browser platform can be specified. Sadly there are plenty of differences
between IE, Netscape and the upcoming Mozilla that make cross browser
implementations quite hairy (and I've been tackling then all day today -
things position differently in each browser even when specified by the
pixel!).

The days of chucking static html to the browser are leaving us and saying
"but all I want to do is display HTML so sod it" may well be valid for your
own site but increasingly you will be locked out of some of major web sites
and plenty of the minor ones coded by people who only test on IE.

Matt



  reply	other threads:[~2000-07-27 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-07-26 17:43 miller
2000-07-26 17:50 ` James G. Stallings II
2000-07-27  7:43   ` Matt
2000-07-27  7:54     ` Lucio De Re
2000-07-27 17:28       ` Matt [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-07-20  4:05 James A. Robinson
2000-07-20  1:41 rob pike
2000-07-20  8:34 ` George Coulouris
2000-07-19  7:18 forsyth
2000-07-19  7:43 ` Lucio De Re
2000-07-19  7:58 ` Randolph Fritz
2000-07-19 15:23 ` Jonathan Sergent
2000-07-18 23:02 forsyth
2000-07-18 22:30 ` Frank Gleason
2000-07-19  0:17   ` Randolph Fritz
2000-07-19  0:01     ` Frank Gleason
2000-07-19  1:02 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2000-07-19 11:45 ` Theo Honohan
2000-07-18 22:33 rob pike
2000-07-18 22:59 ` Howard Trickey
2000-07-21  8:34 ` Alt
2000-07-25 15:07   ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-18 20:23 miller
2000-07-18 22:07 ` Randolph Fritz
2000-07-18 19:03 Stephen Harris
2000-07-18 19:17 ` Andrey Mirtchovski
2000-07-18 23:48   ` Randolph Fritz
2000-07-19  5:40     ` Randolph Fritz
2000-07-19  9:26   ` Michael Dingler
2000-07-19 15:22   ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2000-07-19 16:28     ` Andrey Mirtchovski
2000-07-19 16:47       ` Randolph Fritz
2000-07-19 22:52       ` sah
2000-07-20  1:16         ` James A. Robinson
2000-07-20  3:08         ` Boyd Roberts
2000-07-26  8:42     ` Ralph Corderoy
2000-07-19  9:27 ` Christopher Browne
2000-07-19 15:24   ` Andy Newman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00af01bff7f0$44af15c0$02a7b6c3@lucid.proweb.net' \
    --to=matt@proweb.co.uk \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    --cc=lucio@proxima.alt.za \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).