From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <00c101c15e0d$5ba96b20$7bf8fea9@oemcomputer>
From: "rob pike" <rob@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <20011025170624.90DB519A17@mail.cse.psu.edu> <vi41yjrl109.fsf@blue.cs.yorku.ca>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Java for Plan 9?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 06:59:59 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0e3e6d96-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

The problem lies mostly in the libraries.  Who's going to reimplement
that enormous pile of, ahem, software.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Ozan Yigit <oz@blue.cs.yorku.ca>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 5:24 AM
Subject: Re: [9fans] Java for Plan 9?


> rob@plan9.bell-labs.com (rob pike) writes:
> 
> 
> > That implementation artifact is a part of the existing implementations,
> > though, which complicates the porting issue.
> 
> perhaps a fresh implementation is more appropriate.
>