From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <00d101c3fab3$87783d40$0c00a8c0@SOMA>
From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <263dd5418b8511aa78f2676b6cf41f8a@terzarima.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Thai Chicken
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:52:25 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f38ef90e-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> a font is just a textual list of subfont files, and any/all could include
references
> to subfonts supporting unicode.  quite a few do.  i'm not sure why some do
and
> some don't (in other words, i don't know what cost they are trying to
reduce).

my theory is that 'common' unicode blocks are there 'cos due to need.

how many thai 9fans have we got?