From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <00d301c38cb8$b5d6f320$c901a8c0@cc77109e> From: "Bruce Ellis" To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> References: Subject: Re: [9fans] 'wall' messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:50:08 +1000 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 64fabe8a-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 absolute horseshit. i guess you don't understand that the namepace of the user is in their terminal p9, not on the cpu server. as for your claims about user priv, well you don't understand auth either. oh and i found this on another mailing list. "The relentless mass spamming by professor rat and Jim Choate keeps new comers away, since 99% of the posts to the list is from people who hate the ideas that the list was created to further, and seek to shut it down, to prevent thought about and discussion of such ideas..." Now I know what you do when you don't sprout garbage here. brucee ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Choate" To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:31 PM Subject: Re: [9fans] 'wall' messages > Wait a minute, the users don't own those resources, they're borrowing > them. Within the context of the particular hardware it is completely > reasonable to leave bootes in control. Nobody is suggesting that bootes > necessarily be able to go out off that hardware and act as that user. > > You're position basically lets the user have free reign over something > that isn't theirs. Yuck!