From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net>
Subject: Re: Drawterm and Inferno? Was: [9fans] fortune-worthy
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Message-id: <00e301c3c643$b7736f50$75079486@SOMA>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
References: <e3db0198e13e127a29c04d9ca1589008@plan9.bell-labs.com>
 <577fd0c726f326714323074c32cead74@centurytel.net>
 <20031219090231.086ab039.martin@parvat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:21:02 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ab4d6af4-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> Given the recent changes to Inferno (fileserving, graphics, etc), would
> it not be relatively easy (or at least, easier than it was) to rewrite
> drawterm in limbo?
>
> The advantages are obvious - a single drawterm binary would work
> identically on all the platforms supported by Inferno!

sounds like a plan and you could bugfix it without, say, a =B5$loth SDK.