From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Sam Hopkins <sah@softcardsystems.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] keyboards
References: <200109241957.f8OJvdT01753@ducky.net>
In-Reply-To: <200109241957.f8OJvdT01753@ducky.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01092509032901.08900@softnet>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 09:03:29 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f31ae9a4-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

I'd be interested in knowing this myself, since the HH lite model
is almost identical to the 5100C (save for the Sun/Type 5 layout) and
the HH lite is approximately twice the cost.

Perhaps it's the "Linuxcare Labs" certification that comes with the
HH that makes it worth so much more ...

I've used a 5100C quite happily for a little over a year now.

Sam

On Monday 24 September 2001
15:57, you wrote:
> speaking of keyboards, would anybody who has used both
> the Behavioral Technologies BTC-5100 and the Happy Hacking
> keyboards care to compare them?