From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu, David Gordon Hogan <dhog@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Private Namespaces for Linux
References: <20011120224044.77D38199FA@mail.cse.psu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20011120224044.77D38199FA@mail.cse.psu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0111201547090G.13061@snaresland>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 15:47:09 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 25c3215a-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Tuesday 20 November 2001 15:40, David Gordon Hogan wrote:
> Just out of curiousity, how does the Linux ``namespaces''
> implementation handle the many juicy attacks possible
> against set-uid programs?  Do set-uid programs get
> thrown into a default namespace?

set-uid is stupid. So I don't allow it.

ron