From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <012801c43f3f$c70a7f60$207e7d50@SOMA>
From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <20040521113733.LDBQ14728.mxfep02.bredband.com@mxfep02>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Process distribution?
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 16:27:38 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8349da82-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> Functionality on the CPU servers to stop responding to CPU
> binding requests when they would be overloaded, and accept
> when the load drops.

i think you need virtual cpu servers.  cpu <name> binds stuff
to a group of CPUs and they work out the scheduling.

'natch some CPUs have are multiprocessor, eliminating
the process migration problem.

621109-4138