From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <018171da47f1d62ed7e0278bf14eb90c@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] permission bit of /mail/box From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 16:12:59 +0900 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4090553c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > I think the noarchive bit would be trivial to implement -- the > necessary code already exists in order to avoid archiving /n/snap. > I'm just not sure it's a good idea. I expected this answer. I think it depends on how we consider what is junk. I believe there are many junks in the real world, and we should be able to judge which is junk or not by ourselves when it is concerned ourselves at least. I'm receiving thousands of junk mails describing MS Custermer etc. I think those are definetly junks and never to go archive. Some students may gather some kinds of pictures in his home directory. Those must not be archived! Kenji