From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <019a01c0cf51$9924cbc0$e8b7c6d4@SOMA> From: "Boyd Roberts" To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu> References: <20010426210148.4FA2719A2B@mail.cse.psu.edu>, <00d401c0cf29$0f049060$e8b7c6d4@SOMA> <3AE99688.96A84266@arl.army.mil> Subject: Re: [9fans] the declaration of main() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 21:38:13 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 95a989e2-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" > > All that fighting a well-established standard does is to > isolate you from the rest of the world. Do you really think > that there is no C code of value except for whatever has been > constructed specifically for Plan 9? obviously not. so we're stuck on a 'class 1 disagreement'. ie. you don't understand my position. a bad standard is worse than no standard at all. datakit was a 'standard': not known to work reliably at any speed, but the code is huge