From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <01bb01c516d5$143f6030$1f587d50@kilgore>
From: "boyd, rounin" <boyd@insultant.net>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
References: <ee9e417a05021912153b6c45ee@mail.gmail.com><01a701c516d1$f8df3200$1f587d50@kilgore>
	<20050219224434.GB44386@mero.morphisms.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Venti security in view of SHA-1 exploity
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:48:06 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 10915954-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> To be more precise: 2DES doesn't buy you much over DES,
> while 3DES would appear to.

nope, there is a meet in the middle attack for 2DES and going
to 3DES is trivial to implement.
--
MGRS 31U DQ 52572 12604