From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Vlad Giszpenc" To: <9fans@9fans.net> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:00:27 -0400 Message-ID: <01f601cf60b0$3d7df810$b879e830$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01F7_01CF608E.B66CCD40" Subject: [9fans] Factotum Using identity vs token Topicbox-Message-UUID: dbf764b4-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01F7_01CF608E.B66CCD40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Has anyone tried to make Factotum use Identity based encryption? See http://crypto.stanford.edu/pbc/. The idea would be to make it a private key generator. Then everything on the network could use a URI to encrypt stuff. PKI would still be needed to secure identity of the PKG but it still seems like a nice fit. Just curious. Thanks, Vlad ------=_NextPart_000_01F7_01CF608E.B66CCD40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 

Has anyone = tried to make Factotum use Identity based encryption?  See http://crypto.stanford.edu/pbc/<= /a>.  The idea would be to make it a private key generator.  = Then everything on the network could use a URI to encrypt stuff.  = PKI would still be needed to secure identity of the PKG but it still = seems like a nice fit.

 

 

Just = curious…

 

 

Thanks,

 

Vlad

 

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_01F7_01CF608E.B66CCD40--